Legal and constitutional framework around pocket rescission contested
5 Sep 25 9:00 PM · 19d ago · 13 articles · 5 posts · 4 sources · development 5 of 6
The Government Accountability Office has called the "pocket rescission" maneuver illegal. The prior pocket rescission issued by Trump a year ago, blocking $4.9 billion in foreign aid, was not blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court, which cited Trump's authority over foreign affairs. This year's action targets domestic spending. Trump argues the tool is legally permissible under the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, though the law contains ambiguities.
“Not only is the delay itself an impoundment that was not reported to Congress, but also it is a usurpation of Congress's appropriations powers. OMB is an agency of the executive branch. It does not get to decide which programs are worth funding.”
Senator Susan Collins, Republican Senator, Senate Appropriations Committee chair · rss ↗
Donald Trump President
Susan Collins Republican Senator, Senate Appropriations Committee chair
Patty Murray Democratic Senator, Senate Appropriations Committee vice-chair
Office of Management and Budget Executive agency implementing rescission
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What was reported 1 claim about this development
-
first by CBS News, 19d ago · also Newsweek
1 more headline
- Lawmakers Rip Trump Over 'Illegal' Pocket Rescission Move—What We Know Newsweek · 19d ago
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
S
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is canceling nearly $1 billion in spending approved by Congress, the White House announced on Friday, using a rare and contested power to axe funding for immigrant services and diversity-focused initiatives. https:// apnews.com/article/trump-resci…
All 6 developments of Trump cancels $810M in congressionally approved spending… →
NewswiresMastodonRedditBlueskyGoogle News