Tech
Math researcher debunks OpenAI's faster Fourier transform as flawed
Argmin technical critique questions OpenAI's mathematical rigor
4
Oct 12 11:14 AM
· 2d ago · 2 posts · 1 source · development 4 of 5
A detailed mathematical analysis published on Argmin argues that OpenAI's claimed faster Fourier transform is not a genuine breakthrough. The author notes the paper was not carefully reviewed and compares the research process to 'AI slop'—using AI to analyze AI-generated mathematics.
github.com
“Did I read this paper? Of course not. No one at OpenAI read this paper either, so why should I? I did what every other mathematician in the world does with AI slop mathematics: I fed it back into the slop machine.”
Argmin author
OpenAI Research organization Argmin author Mathematics researcher and technical critic Ryan Shea Independent researcher John D. Cook Mathematics blogger
The whole story articles posts
the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Peak 9 pieces in two hours at Oct 12, 10 PM; 37 pieces over 8 days (2 articles · 15 posts · 20 comments)
Oct 6, 8 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Hacker News 1 Oct 6, 10 PM — quiet Oct 7, 12 AM — quiet Oct 7, 2 AM — quiet Oct 7, 4 AM — quiet Oct 7, 6 AM — quiet Oct 7, 8 AM — quiet Oct 7, 10 AM — quiet Oct 7, 12 PM — quiet Oct 7, 2 PM — quiet Oct 7, 4 PM — quiet Oct 7, 6 PM — quiet Oct 7, 8 PM — quiet Oct 7, 10 PM — quiet Oct 8, 12 AM — quiet Oct 8, 2 AM — quiet Oct 8, 4 AM — quiet Oct 8, 6 AM — quiet Oct 8, 8 AM — quiet Oct 8, 10 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Hacker News 1 Oct 8, 12 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — X 1 Oct 8, 2 PM — quiet Oct 8, 4 PM — quiet Oct 8, 6 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Hacker News 1 Oct 8, 8 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Hacker News 1 Oct 8, 10 PM — quiet Oct 9, 12 AM — quiet Oct 9, 2 AM — quiet Oct 9, 4 AM — quiet Oct 9, 6 AM — quiet Oct 9, 8 AM — quiet Oct 9, 10 AM — quiet Oct 9, 12 PM — quiet Oct 9, 2 PM — quiet Oct 9, 4 PM — quiet Oct 9, 6 PM — quiet Oct 9, 8 PM — quiet Oct 9, 10 PM — quiet Oct 10, 12 AM — quiet Oct 10, 2 AM — quiet Oct 10, 4 AM — quiet Oct 10, 6 AM — quiet Oct 10, 8 AM — quiet Oct 10, 10 AM — quiet Oct 10, 12 PM — quiet Oct 10, 2 PM — quiet Oct 10, 4 PM — quiet Oct 10, 6 PM — quiet Oct 10, 8 PM — quiet Oct 10, 10 PM — quiet Oct 11, 12 AM — quiet Oct 11, 2 AM — quiet Oct 11, 4 AM — quiet Oct 11, 6 AM — quiet Oct 11, 8 AM — quiet Oct 11, 10 AM — quiet Oct 11, 12 PM — quiet Oct 11, 2 PM — quiet Oct 11, 4 PM — quiet Oct 11, 6 PM — quiet Oct 11, 8 PM — quiet Oct 11, 10 PM — quiet Oct 12, 12 AM — quiet Oct 12, 2 AM — quiet Oct 12, 4 AM — quiet Oct 12, 6 AM — quiet Oct 12, 8 AM — quiet Oct 12, 10 AM — 2 pieces · 2 posts — X 1, Hacker News 1 Oct 12, 12 PM — quiet Oct 12, 2 PM — 2 pieces · 2 posts — Hacker News 1, X 1 Oct 12, 4 PM — quiet Oct 12, 6 PM — quiet Oct 12, 8 PM — quiet Oct 12, 10 PM — 9 pieces · 2 articles · 1 post · 6 comments — Hacker News 7, Newswires 2 Oct 13, 12 AM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Hacker News 3 Oct 13, 2 AM — 3 pieces · 1 post · 2 comments — Hacker News 2, Mastodon 1 Oct 13, 4 AM — 3 pieces · 2 posts · 1 comment — Hacker News 2, Lobsters 1 Oct 13, 6 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Hacker News 2 Oct 13, 8 AM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Hacker News 3 Oct 13, 10 AM — 3 pieces · 2 posts · 1 comment — Mastodon 2, Hacker News 1 Oct 13, 12 PM — quiet Oct 13, 2 PM — quiet Oct 13, 4 PM — quiet Oct 13, 6 PM — quiet Oct 13, 8 PM — quiet Oct 13, 10 PM — quiet Yesterday, 12 AM — quiet Yesterday, 2 AM — quiet Yesterday, 4 AM — quiet Yesterday, 6 AM — quiet Yesterday, 8 AM — quiet Yesterday, 10 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1 Yesterday, 12 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1 Yesterday, 2 PM — quiet Yesterday, 4 PM — quiet Yesterday, 6 PM — quiet Yesterday, 8 PM — quiet Yesterday, 10 PM — quiet Today, 12 AM — quiet Today, 2 AM — quiet
1 2–3 4 5
Oct 7 Oct 8 Oct 9 Oct 10 Oct 11 Oct 12 Oct 13 now · 3:08 AM ET
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
@
OpenAI’s faster Fourier transform is less a mathematical breakthrough and more a malicious exploit of mathematical traditions.
@
Is the @OpenAI Faster Fourier Transform merely a theory hack that cheats by relying on arbitrary precision real arithmetic? The answer is no: the savings are preserved when the algorithm is transferred to the finite odd characteristic setting, where no o(n log n) algorithm was
All 5 developments of Math researcher debunks OpenAI's faster Fourier transform… →
Hacker News X Newswires Mastodon Lobsters