Anthropic and OpenAI respond to Reuters' findings
1 Today 6:02 AM · 17h ago · 3 articles · 3 posts · 4 sources · development 1 of 1
Anthropic said the characterization did not reflect all its discussions, saying it had made clear that evaluators control their methods, criteria, conclusions and what to publish, while reserving approval rights for new evaluator firms. OpenAI said it was not seeking approval rights over full report text, citing a standard practice of redacting confidential information.
“without editorial control”
Dario Amodei, Anthropic CEO · rss ↗
Dario Amodei Anthropic CEOAnthropic AI lab, maker of ClaudeOpenAI AI lab, maker of ChatGPT
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 2 claims were published in its stretch
-
2 outlets Exclusive-Behind AI industry’s call for independent reviews, a fight over what gets made public
first by Investing.com News, 12h ago · also Channel News Asia
-
first by Reuters, 15h ago
All 1 developments of Anthropic, OpenAI sought control over what AI evaluators… →
NewswiresMastodonHacker NewsReddit