Social media reaction splits between support and skepticism
2 Yesterday 11:37 PM · 7h ago · 4 posts · 1 comment · 3 sources · development 2 of 2
Supporters on X and Mastodon call the nationalization push bold and necessary, while at least one commenter questions whether contractual force majeure clauses complicate the legal basis for action.
“A bold, brilliant and necessary strategy.”
@gbickerton398
Avi Lewis Federal NDP Leader
Marit Stiles Ontario NDP Leader
Mélanie Joly Industry MinisterStelco Hamilton-based steelmaker
Mark Carney Prime Minister of Canada
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by Mastodon, 1m ago
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
D
Big. Necessary. May escalate our conflict in ways most are not prepared for - but doing nothing is not option, and appearing hesitant to defend our interests is nearly as bad. "Lewis noted that the United Kingdom nationalized British Steel in July, saying the move protected "thousands of jobs." In September, the U.K. government announced plans for…
-
Force majeure is almost guaranteed to exist in the contract somewhere. I've never seen a purchase order without one on major contract.
All 2 developments of NDP Leaders Urge Carney to Nationalize Stelco After Layoff… →
MastodonRedditX