conv.

All stories

Senate Republicans vote to hold Dr. Fauci in contempt of Congress

A Senate committee approved a criminal referral against the former COVID czar for invoking the Fifth Amendment, presenting the DOJ with complex prosecutorial choices.

Conversation activity · last 4 days peak 1/hr

Peak 1 item in one hour at Aug 6, 10 AM; 17 items over 4 days Aug 6, 9 AM — 2 itemsAug 6, 10 AM — 1 itemAug 6, 11 AM — no itemsAug 6, 12 PM — 1 itemAug 6, 1 PM — no itemsAug 6, 2 PM — no itemsAug 6, 3 PM — no itemsAug 6, 4 PM — no itemsAug 6, 5 PM — 1 itemAug 6, 6 PM — no itemsAug 6, 7 PM — no itemsAug 6, 8 PM — no itemsAug 6, 9 PM — no itemsAug 6, 10 PM — no itemsAug 6, 11 PM — no itemsAug 7, 12 AM — no itemsAug 7, 1 AM — no itemsAug 7, 2 AM — no itemsAug 7, 3 AM — no itemsAug 7, 4 AM — no itemsAug 7, 5 AM — no itemsAug 7, 6 AM — no itemsAug 7, 7 AM — no itemsAug 7, 8 AM — no itemsAug 7, 9 AM — no itemsAug 7, 10 AM — no itemsAug 7, 11 AM — no itemsAug 7, 12 PM — no itemsAug 7, 1 PM — no itemsAug 7, 2 PM — no itemsAug 7, 3 PM — no itemsAug 7, 4 PM — no itemsAug 7, 5 PM — 1 itemAug 7, 6 PM — no itemsAug 7, 7 PM — no itemsAug 7, 8 PM — no itemsAug 7, 9 PM — no itemsAug 7, 10 PM — no itemsAug 7, 11 PM — no itemsAug 8, 12 AM — 1 itemAug 8, 1 AM — no itemsAug 8, 2 AM — no itemsAug 8, 3 AM — no itemsAug 8, 4 AM — no itemsAug 8, 5 AM — no itemsAug 8, 6 AM — no itemsAug 8, 7 AM — no itemsAug 8, 8 AM — no itemsAug 8, 9 AM — no itemsAug 8, 10 AM — no itemsAug 8, 11 AM — no itemsAug 8, 12 PM — 2 itemsAug 8, 1 PM — no itemsAug 8, 2 PM — no itemsAug 8, 3 PM — no itemsAug 8, 4 PM — 1 itemAug 8, 5 PM — no itemsAug 8, 6 PM — no itemsAug 8, 7 PM — no itemsAug 8, 8 PM — no itemsAug 8, 9 PM — no itemsAug 8, 10 PM — no itemsAug 8, 11 PM — no itemsAug 9, 12 AM — no itemsAug 9, 1 AM — no itemsAug 9, 2 AM — no itemsAug 9, 3 AM — no itemsAug 9, 4 AM — no itemsAug 9, 5 AM — 2 itemsAug 9, 6 AM — no itemsAug 9, 7 AM — no itemsAug 9, 8 AM — no itemsAug 9, 9 AM — 1 itemAug 9, 10 AM — no itemsAug 9, 11 AM — no itemsAug 9, 12 PM — no itemsAug 9, 1 PM — 2 itemsAug 9, 2 PM — 1 itemAug 9, 3 PM — 1 itemAug 9, 4 PM — no itemsAug 9, 5 PM — no itemsAug 9, 6 PM — no itemsAug 9, 7 PM — no itemsAug 9, 8 PM — no itemsAug 9, 9 PM — no itemsAug 9, 10 PM — no itemsAug 9, 11 PM — no itemsAug 10, 12 AM — no itemsAug 10, 1 AM — no itemsAug 10, 2 AM — no itemsAug 10, 3 AM — no itemsAug 10, 4 AM — no itemsAug 10, 5 AM — no itemsAug 10, 6 AM — no itemsAug 10, 7 AM — no itemsAug 10, 8 AM — no itemsAug 10, 9 AM — no itemsAug 10, 10 AM — no items 1 item · 10 AM
Aug 7Aug 8Aug 9Aug 10

Summary, timeline and people extracted by Claude from 17 items across 4 sources · 20h ago. Quotes are verbatim.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted along party lines on August 6 to hold former COVID-19 director Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he declined to answer questions about his pandemic role, asserting his Fifth Amendment rights 111 times during testimony. The referral now faces the Justice Department with difficult decisions about whether to pursue criminal charges, given the legal and political complexities involved.

  • Senate committee voted along party lines on August 6 to refer Fauci for contempt after he invoked Fifth Amendment 111 times.
  • Fauci declined to answer questions about his role directing the federal COVID-19 response.
  • The DOJ now faces complicated prosecutorial decisions with significant legal and political risks in pursuing charges.
  • The referral is embedded in broader partisan disputes over pandemic policy and Trump administration tensions.

How it unfolded

  1. Analysis Detailed analysis of DOJ options

    The Hill provides comprehensive analysis of the 'incredibly messy' choices facing the Department of Justice regarding whether to prosecute the criminal referral.

  2. Analysis DOJ faces prosecutorial dilemma

    The Hill reports that the contempt charge presents significant legal and political pitfalls for prosecutors should the Justice Department choose to pursue the case.

  3. Reaction Social media reaction to vote

    Bluesky user middleageriot characterized the Republican vote as retaliatory against Fauci for standing up to Trump.

    “BREAKING: Senate Republicans voted to hold Dr. Fauci in contempt of Congress for having the balls to stand up to Trump.”

    middleageriot.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
  4. Event Senate committee votes contempt

    The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he declined to answer questions about his role in the COVID pandemic, invoking the Fifth Amendment 111 times.

What people are saying verbatim

“BREAKING: Senate Republicans voted to hold Dr. Fauci in contempt of Congress for having the balls to stand up to Trump.”

middleageriot.bsky.social, Bluesky user · Bluesky ↗ · Aug 6, 10:44 AM

“The push to charge former COVID czar Anthony Fauci with contempt of Congress is full of pitfalls for prosecutors, should the Justice Department choose to take up the case.”

The Hill, News publication · The Hill ↗ · Aug 9, 6:00 AM

“A Senate committee has voted to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he declined to answer questions about his role in the Covid pandemic.”

STAT News, News publication · STAT News ↗ · Aug 6, 9:12 AM

Voices from the web unedited

  • BREAKING: Senate Republicans voted to hold Dr. Fauci in contempt of Congress for having the balls to stand up to Trump.

    middleageriot.bsky.socialBluesky4d ago320▲view on Bluesky ↗
  • How many of those suicides do you honestly think weren't related? Considering those close to suicide could easily be pushed over the edge by watching an entire country refuse vaccines and masks because a reality TV star felon said so. And then watch as 1.3 million Americans die because of it. More than any other country. And more than all the wars…

    Rmansr/politics21h agoview on r/politics ↗
  • I vote for the furthest left candidate in every primary; I ended up with a Democratic rep who signed the letter thanking ICE after they committed terrorism in LA.

    LiveChocolate8819r/politics20h agoview on r/politics ↗
  • “When we use our constitutional rights, we’re good and based. When you use your constitutional rights, you don’t have them.” - Republicans

    CelestialFuryr/politics19h agoview on r/politics ↗
  • Pirro has already “gone against” Trump in the Reflecting Pool cases, and all four cases have already been dismissed.

    AmericusBarbaricussr/politics21h agoview on r/politics ↗