conv.

All stories
Running 1d

Firefox Containers Preview

Firefox Containers Preview
browsers

Conversation activity · last 28 hours peak 5/hr

Peak 5 items in one hour at Aug 10, 11 AM; 23 items over 28 hours Aug 10, 5 AM — 1 itemAug 10, 6 AM — 1 itemAug 10, 7 AM — 1 itemAug 10, 8 AM — 1 itemAug 10, 9 AM — no itemsAug 10, 10 AM — 2 itemsAug 10, 11 AM — 5 itemsAug 10, 12 PM — 1 itemAug 10, 1 PM — 1 itemAug 10, 2 PM — 1 itemAug 10, 3 PM — 3 itemsAug 10, 4 PM — 1 itemAug 10, 5 PM — no itemsAug 10, 6 PM — no itemsAug 10, 7 PM — no itemsAug 10, 8 PM — no itemsAug 10, 9 PM — 2 itemsAug 10, 10 PM — 1 itemAug 10, 11 PM — no itemsAug 11, 12 AM — no itemsAug 11, 1 AM — no itemsAug 11, 2 AM — no itemsAug 11, 3 AM — 1 itemAug 11, 4 AM — no itemsAug 11, 5 AM — no itemsAug 11, 6 AM — no itemsAug 11, 7 AM — no itemsAug 11, 8 AM — 1 item 5 items · 11 AM
Aug 11

Clustered from 23 items across 1 source. Not yet parsed — the coverage below is the raw record.

Social posts 1

Voices from the web unedited

  • Under the hood, it uses the [same technology](https://www.mozillafoundation.org/de/research/library/extending-the-same-origin-policy-with-origin-attributes/) that we use for our core security architecture around Same-Origin-Policy and process isolation. We are actively hunting for bugs in the area and committed to fixing them :)

    freddybbrowsers22h ago31▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • I’m a heavy user of multi-account containers. I also use another helper extending which lets you set domain rules, e.g. “*.ibm.com goes in the ibm container”. That functionality in the first party implementation would be awesome.

    jmtdbrowsers19h ago21▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • I don’t get it. Are you making fun of some past behavior from the Mozilla marketing team? Care to share what happened?

    altanobrowsers17h ago9▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • I wonder if they now will also make it possible to truly seperate the background process of extensions for containers. [It has been an open issue for 9 years now](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1380812). The tl;dr there is that private browsing and firefox containers are not entirely sandboxed as far as extensions go. For example, if…

    creeschbrowsers20h ago7▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • I've been loudly critical of Mozilla in the past but this is a great example of the sorts of moves they should be making. Well done, I'm looking forward to seeing it come through.

    jackdkbrowsers11h ago5▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • IIUC the extension is just frontend to the native containers and it _should_ work correctly out of the box

    patrykbrowsers1d ago5▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • > Plus, I don't think it synchs across my account. It does, but maybe you have to activate the synchronisation of extensions. I think it was the solution in my case.

    jmivenbrowsers21h ago4▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • Nice! I have been using the containers extension for around a year or so for work, and TBH i've been really satisfied with what it does. I use Firefox as my main browser for both work and personal stuff, and having tabs on different containers is very handy. Like, having two gmail (/Google) sessions open on different containers and things just…

    epidemianbrowsers21h ago3▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • How? I've been using it for 10 years and the only thing I could think off the top of my head is: how to create a new tab with a shortcut, and I don't see a way to do that with 10 containers without breaking my fingers or mixing up keybinds. maybe a modal popup.

    winkbrowsers5h ago3▲view on Lobsters ↗
  • I use multi-account containers pretty much all the time and I hope this improves the experience. Right now I find the UX a bit unintuitive and sometimes difficult to work with. Plus, I don't think it synchs across my account.

    rainbow_birdbrowsers21h ago3▲view on Lobsters ↗