conv.

All stories
Active · 11h

When Bob Bauer and David French balked at the idea of expanding the Supreme Court, @deadcarl.bsky.social recognized it for what it was: not…

2 items181 engagement5 comments BlueskyMastodon
When Bob Bauer and David French balked at the idea of expanding the Supreme Court, @deadcarl.bsky.social recognized it for what it was: not…
liberalcurrents.com

Conversation activity · last 12 hours peak 1/15m

Peak 1 item in one 15m at Aug 11, 7 AM; 2 items over 12 hours Aug 11, 6:47 AM — no itemsAug 11, 7:02 AM — 1 item · Bluesky 1Aug 11, 7:17 AM — no itemsAug 11, 7:32 AM — no itemsAug 11, 7:47 AM — no itemsAug 11, 8:02 AM — no itemsAug 11, 8:17 AM — no itemsAug 11, 8:32 AM — no itemsAug 11, 8:47 AM — no itemsAug 11, 9:02 AM — no itemsAug 11, 9:17 AM — no itemsAug 11, 9:32 AM — no itemsAug 11, 9:47 AM — no itemsAug 11, 10:02 AM — no itemsAug 11, 10:17 AM — no itemsAug 11, 10:32 AM — no itemsAug 11, 10:47 AM — no itemsAug 11, 11:02 AM — no itemsAug 11, 11:17 AM — no itemsAug 11, 11:32 AM — no itemsAug 11, 11:47 AM — no itemsAug 11, 12:02 PM — no itemsAug 11, 12:17 PM — no itemsAug 11, 12:32 PM — 1 item · Mastodon 1Aug 11, 12:47 PM — no itemsAug 11, 1:02 PM — no itemsAug 11, 1:17 PM — no itemsAug 11, 1:32 PM — no itemsAug 11, 1:47 PM — no itemsAug 11, 2:02 PM — no itemsAug 11, 2:17 PM — no itemsAug 11, 2:32 PM — no itemsAug 11, 2:47 PM — no itemsAug 11, 3:02 PM — no itemsAug 11, 3:17 PM — no itemsAug 11, 3:32 PM — no itemsAug 11, 3:47 PM — no itemsAug 11, 4:02 PM — no itemsAug 11, 4:17 PM — no itemsAug 11, 4:32 PM — no itemsAug 11, 4:47 PM — no itemsAug 11, 5:02 PM — no itemsAug 11, 5:17 PM — no itemsAug 11, 5:32 PM — no itemsAug 11, 5:47 PM — no itemsAug 11, 6:02 PM — no itemsAug 11, 6:17 PM — no itemsAug 11, 6:32 PM — no items 1 item · 7:02 AM
8 AM10 AM12 PM2 PM4 PMnow · 6:47 PM

Clustered from 2 items across 2 sources. Not yet parsed — the coverage below is the raw record.

Social posts 2

Voices from the web unedited

  • When Bob Bauer and David French balked at the idea of expanding the Supreme Court, @deadcarl.bsky.social recognized it for what it was: not analytical rigor but a lack of what Clausewitz called the “moral courage” required to meet our moment.

    liberalcurrents.comBluesky11h ago179▲view on Bluesky ↗

  • “If Democrats hold back from [Supreme Court] reform for the sake of maintaining norms, they will be maintaining something that no longer serves its purpose.” Because “you cannot restore norms if the other side is not also interested in doing so, and there is every indication that Republicans will continue their pattern of bad behavior.”…

    Akshay@eupolicy.socialMastodon · newsie.social6h ago2▲view on Mastodon ↗