Woman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned'
Conversation activity · last 24 hours peak 7/hr
Clustered from 22 items across 3 sources. Not yet parsed — the coverage below is the raw record.
Social posts 3
Voices from the web unedited
-
Male doctors being clueless boneheads to female patients - a story with a long and un-illustrious history. When I was in my 20's (this was 30-odd years ago) I worked as an Environmental Geologist. When you do that for a living, you have to get an annual physical where they check you for your exposure to stuff like lead, asbestos and other toxic…
-
The laws are based on a time where 'recording' someone was a more manual sort of effort. When 'being a photographer' takes rolls of film, cost of processing, expensive cameras then there's inherently an overhead of 'recording' things in public. If you wanted to 'do surveillance' on someone, it probably took a bunch of people, and they need to be…
-
Collecting data doesn't mean secretly recording and uploading video and audio. Yes, it does. They use humans and AI to rate and annotate what people are saying. Or doing, in terms of video. I link to the ridiculous amount of evidence to all of that here…
-
Because owning a camera and having it on your person does not mean that you are using the camera at any given time. Having the ability to film is not illegal even in private. In the case of the doctor, there are so many less conspicuous and cheaper ways they could secretly film their patients than wearing a camera on their face. Pen cameras, watch…
-
But no one who makes laws in the US can convert a word doc to a PDF I work in telecommunications with a team of people that are considered techs and engineers who have been on computers the majority of their life that would not be able to figure out how to do this. Most of them struggle with the concept of unzipping a file while I struggle to…
-
First off, these glasses are a terrible idea and should be banned or at least require affirmative consent from third parties in situations in which there's an expectation of privacy. Im more curious about whether or not the glasses would be legal even in one-party consent states if they saved the recording locally. Like is it illegal to even make…
-
Having spent a decade securing health records, Meta likely has many of the requirements in place and almost definitely has the capability for the rest. Doesn't matter if they meat security standards, there has to be a data sharing or BAA with the 3rd party. Even if they had one with meta, I can't imagine this would be an authorized way to transmit…
-
Am a doctor. Hate these glasses. Had a colleague wear them at work because he liked bone conduction music while not looking like he had headphones. I thought it was clever, but would never myself. Honestly didn’t think much of it until this. The cameras in patients rooms are a problem for sure.
-
Wow! I had the same experience. “Are you taking photos?” “…yes?” Then super annoyed and kinda forceful, “you have to delete that!” I’m thinking, what? This is my wife’s health and our first experience with pregnancy. Delete this for whose sake? The hospitals? Idc lmao still have it.
-
If I have my phone pointed at the screen I was using all the time would you expect me of recording the information because these glasses have a camera pointed at the screen whenever he is using it and there is no way of knowing if he is recording or not.