Carrington ejected, posts 'white privilege'; Guardian columnist examines disparity
After a flagrant foul ejection, Chicago Sky guard Angel Carrington's social media post sparks debate over differential treatment of Black and white WNBA players.
Conversation activity · last 4 days presspostscomments the crowd ↓
Every item, in order 7
Latest coverage newest 5 of 5 items
What to know
- Both Cunningham (2025) and Carrington (2026) received identical Flagrant 2 ejections, but their post-incident trajectories diverged sharply.
- Cunningham's 2025 ejection led to rebranding as an 'enforcer,' exponential social media growth (300K to 1M TikTok followers), and major endorsement deals; Carrington faced different treatment after her ejection.
- Etan Thomas's column frames this disparity as evidence of white privilege operating not in officiating but in public perception and commercial opportunity.
- Online response is divided, with supporters of Thomas's analysis engaging alongside critics who frame the piece as unfair to Cunningham.
How it unfolded
-
A Bluesky user criticizes the Guardian article as a 'hit job' on Cunningham, framing her as someone being 'abused and attacked for saying male athletes don't belong in female sports,' calling the piece 'a new low for The Guardian.'
“Disgraceful article. Not because it's about white privilege and racism, which are issues we have to address. But because it's a hit job on a woman who's being abused and attacked for saying male athletes don't belong in female sports.”
wildasparagus.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗ -
The Guardian piece is shared on Bluesky and begins generating discussion around the framing of white privilege in WNBA treatment.
-
Guardian sports columnist Etan Thomas publishes an analysis arguing that while both Cunningham and Carrington were ejected for comparable fouls, the aftermath reveals racial disparity: Cunningham emerged as an 'enforcer' with exponential follower growth and endorsement deals, whereas a Black player committing the same act faces different public perception and commercial opportunities.
“A white player is ejected, and emerges with exponentially more followers, an 'enforcer' identity, and lucrative endorsements. Now imagine if Carrington had been flooded with endorsement deals built around being an 'enforcer'...”
Etan Thomas · Newswires ↗ -
In a Chicago Sky vs. Indiana Fever game, Angel Carrington is ejected after being assessed a Flagrant 2 for making contact with Cunningham's head and neck area during transition defense. Carrington maintains she was making a play on the ball and didn't intentionally hit Cunningham. Even Cunningham's coach, Stephanie White, says she doesn't believe Carrington intentionally tried to hurt Cunningham.
-
After her ejection, Carrington posts "WHITE PRIVILEGE" on social media. She later clarifies the post had nothing to do with the officiating decision itself.
- 62 weeks quiet
-
Sophie Cunningham commits a Flagrant 2 foul against Connecticut Sun guard Jacy Sheldon, wrapping her up as she drives toward the basket and sending her to the floor. Cunningham is ejected and fined by the WNBA.
-
Following her ejection, Cunningham is portrayed as an enforcer protecting teammate Caitlin Clark rather than a dangerous player. Her TikTok following explodes from 300,000 to over one million, and she secures lucrative marketing deals including a Ring partnership that plays off her 'protector' image.
What people are saying verbatim
“A white player is ejected, and emerges with exponentially more followers, an 'enforcer' identity, and lucrative endorsements.”
Etan Thomas, Guardian sports columnist · The Guardian ↗ · Aug 10
“Carrington, who is Black, maintained she was making a play on the ball and didn't intentionally hit Cunningham, who is white.”
Etan Thomas, Guardian sports columnist · The Guardian ↗ · Aug 10
“Instead, the white privilege is found in what happened next.”
Etan Thomas, Guardian sports columnist · The Guardian ↗ · Aug 10
“Her TikTok following exploded from 300,000 to over one million, and she was flooded with lucrative marketing opportunities.”
Etan Thomas, Guardian sports columnist · The Guardian ↗ · Aug 10
“Disgraceful article. Not because it's about white privilege and racism, which are issues we have to address. But because it's a hit job on a woman who's being abused and attacked for saying male athletes don't belong in female sports.”
wildasparagus.bsky.social, Bluesky user · Bluesky ↗ · Aug 11
The conversation unedited, verbatim
112 comments claimed on the threads · 4 collected here from 1 site · 2 voices below over time ↑
Where people stand verbatim
The conversation centers on whether the Guardian column fairly analyzes differential treatment or unfairly targets Cunningham. Supporters of Thomas's argument focus on the stark difference in how each player's foul was commercially and narratively repackaged; critics argue the piece is a 'hit job' that conflates race analysis with attacks on a specific player.
Carrington's 'white privilege' post and Thomas's analysis highlight real disparities in how Black and white players are treated commercially and publicly after identical fouls.
-
“'When Cunningham fouls an opponent, she's an enforcer. When Carrington does the same, she's a danger...'”
shrike17.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
The Guardian article is unfairly targeting Cunningham as part of a broader agenda rather than engaging honestly with the facts of the foul or officiating.
-
“Not because it's about white privilege and racism, which are issues we have to address. But because it's a hit job on a woman who's being abused and attacked for saying male athletes don't belong in female sports. A new low for The…”
wildasparagus.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
- Aug 12
-
Disgraceful article. Not because it's about white privilege and racism, which are issues we have to address. But because it's a hit job on a woman who's being abused and attacked for saying male athletes don't belong in female sports. A new low for The Guardian.
- Aug 11
-
'When Cunningham fouls an opponent, she’s an enforcer. When Carrington does the same, she’s a danger...'