Do you trust James Patterson to not use AI to help his book output?
Conversation activity · last 26 hours presspostscomments the crowd ↓
Every item, in order 5
Clustered from 5 items across 2 sources. Not yet parsed — the coverage below is the raw record.
Social posts 2
The conversation unedited, verbatim
4 collected here from 2 sites · 4 voices below over time ↑
- Today
-
Her writing isn't good though? She built a cool world with a dumb plot. Fanfiction writers do it better lol
- Yesterday
-
I understand what you mean. I'm just saying that the works speak for themselves. And even bad people can write good things. Just look at Ender's Game. The author is a homophobic asshole, but his first book is actually a decent novel talking about understanding each other. Unfortunately, he never did follow his own words, which is unfortunate.
-
Right now, the only older authors (that i can think of right now) i would trust to not use ai are Steven King, GRRM, Atwood, Galbadon and Gaiman. There are surely many others i am not thinking of right now, but those are the first that come to mind. Patterson and Childs and the other dime store authors (whom i do like, quite a bit) i would not…
-
https://www. booksns.com/221663/ Do you trust James Patterson to not use AI to help his book output? # books I saw a post several weeks ago accusing Brandon Sanderson of using AI for his novels. (Not that he was doing it, but that he clearly prioritized a high output of books over quality and that kind of mentality was going to inevitably lead to…