conv.

All stories
PoliticsQuiet 12d · day 20

Trump defends taxpayer-funded pro-Trump ads amid bipartisan backlash

After weeks of criticism over $20 million in government-funded self-promotional ads, Trump breaks his silence to say he isn't on the ballot.

Part of a larger narrative

Trump Taxpayer-Funded Campaign Ads

7 stories · since Sep 23 · newest 5h ago — The Trump administration's use of federal funds to pay for television advertisements promoting the president has drawn bipartisan criticism and scrutiny.

  1. DHS Kept Airing Pro-Trump Ads After Judge's Ban, DOJ Then Claims Compliance
  2. Disney, ABC sue Trump's FCC over free speech protections
  3. Trump rolls out $90 Medicare checks to 20 million seniors ahead of midterms
  4. NYT: Trump Personally Directed Taxpayer Money for Pro-Trump TV Ads
  5. Trump cancels $810M in congressionally approved spending via rare 'pocket rescission'
All 7 stories in this narrative →

What to know

  • DHS has allocated roughly $20 million in taxpayer funds for ads promoting Trump, with millions already spent according to ad-tracking estimates.
  • Ethics experts, watchdog groups and lawmakers from both parties say the ads likely violate a federal ban on using public money for "publicity or propaganda."
  • Trump and FCC Chairman Brendan Carr defend the ads as non-political public service announcements rather than campaign material.
  • No enforcement action has been announced; advocacy groups say legal options are being explored.

The dispute Officials like FCC Chairman Carr insist the ads are routine PSAs, while the overwhelming majority of commenters and several ethics experts call them illegal, taxpayer-funded propaganda. · positions read across 372 posts and comments

most voices

The ads are illegal propaganda and a direct misuse of taxpayer money that demands accountability.

  • “All federal taxes should be frozen as our tax money is being stolen and used illegally.”

    stopdropendfascism.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
many voices

Nothing will actually stop this because Trump faces no real legal or political consequences.

  • “He violates federal law every single day. And then nothing happens.”

    johnwares.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

The ad controversy is part of a broader pattern of Trump profiting from or escalating the Iran war while deceiving the public.

  • “Once a CON, always a CON. Trump is a war monger lining his pockets off the Iran War similar to how Dick Cheney profited off the Iraq War.”

    westonjk.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗

Donald TrumpDonald Trump President of the United StatesBrendan Carr FCC ChairmanRichard PainterRichard Painter Former Bush administration ethics lawyerDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) Federal agency funding the adsNorm Eisen / Democracy Defenders Action Legal advocacy group

Trump defends taxpayer-funded pro-Trump ads amid bipartisan backlash
Guardian US

How it unfolded 9 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlesvideospostscomments

Peak 103 pieces in 5h at Sep 24, 11 AM; 755 pieces over 20 days (265 articles · 8 videos · 219 posts · 263 comments) Sep 23, 8 PM — 2 pieces · 2 posts — X 2Sep 24, 1 AM — 3 pieces · 2 articles · 1 post — Newswires 2, Reddit 1Sep 24, 6 AM — 8 pieces · 1 article · 6 posts · 1 comment — Mastodon 5, X 1, Reddit 1, +1 moreSep 24, 11 AM — 103 pieces · 46 articles · 17 posts · 40 comments — Bluesky 41, Newswires 30, Google News 14, +4 moreSep 24, 4 PM — 82 pieces · 13 articles · 22 posts · 47 comments — Bluesky 48, Mastodon 16, Newswires 8, +3 moreSep 24, 9 PM — 12 pieces · 5 posts · 7 comments — Bluesky 6, Mastodon 5, Reddit 1Sep 25, 2 AM — 4 pieces · 1 post · 3 comments — Reddit 2, Bluesky 1, Mastodon 1Sep 25, 7 AM — 20 pieces · 14 articles · 1 video · 5 posts — Newswires 13, Mastodon 4, Bluesky 2, +1 moreSep 25, 12 PM — 17 pieces · 6 articles · 11 posts — Mastodon 6, Newswires 4, Reddit 3, +2 moreSep 25, 5 PM — 14 pieces · 5 articles · 9 posts — Mastodon 5, Newswires 3, Bluesky 3, +2 moreSep 25, 10 PM — quietSep 26, 3 AM — 4 pieces · 1 article · 2 posts · 1 comment — Mastodon 1, Reddit 1, Google News 1, +1 moreSep 26, 8 AM — 7 pieces · 2 articles · 5 posts — Mastodon 4, Google News 1, Reddit 1, +1 moreSep 26, 1 PM — 6 pieces · 6 posts — Mastodon 4, X 1, Bluesky 1Sep 26, 6 PM — quietSep 26, 11 PM — quietSep 27, 4 AM — 1 piece · 1 article — Mastodon 1Sep 27, 9 AM — 31 pieces · 27 articles · 4 posts — Newswires 18, Google News 8, Mastodon 3, +2 moreSep 27, 2 PM — 26 pieces · 10 articles · 12 posts · 4 comments — Mastodon 11, Newswires 7, Reddit 6, +2 moreSep 27, 7 PM — 13 pieces · 3 articles · 1 video · 9 posts — Mastodon 8, Newswires 2, Bluesky 1, +2 moreSep 28, 12 AM — 10 pieces · 8 articles · 2 posts — Google News 5, Newswires 3, Bluesky 1, +1 moreSep 28, 5 AM — 16 pieces · 8 articles · 8 posts — Newswires 6, Mastodon 5, Reddit 3, +2 moreSep 28, 10 AM — 32 pieces · 21 articles · 1 video · 10 posts — Newswires 19, Mastodon 7, Google News 2, +3 moreSep 28, 3 PM — 39 pieces · 22 articles · 2 videos · 15 posts — Mastodon 14, Newswires 13, Google News 7, +3 moreSep 28, 8 PM — 15 pieces · 7 articles · 2 videos · 6 posts — Mastodon 6, Google News 6, YouTube 2, +1 moreSep 29, 1 AM — 12 pieces · 3 articles · 8 posts · 1 comment — Mastodon 5, Bluesky 3, Newswires 2, +1 moreSep 29, 6 AM — 15 pieces · 4 articles · 11 posts — Mastodon 6, Bluesky 4, Newswires 3, +2 moreSep 29, 11 AM — 56 pieces · 37 articles · 16 posts · 3 comments — Newswires 32, Reddit 9, Mastodon 7, +3 moreSep 29, 4 PM — 21 pieces · 5 articles · 6 posts · 10 comments — Reddit 10, Bluesky 3, Mastodon 3, +2 moreSep 29, 9 PM — 10 pieces · 2 articles · 8 posts — Mastodon 6, Reddit 1, Newswires 1, +2 moreSep 30, 2 AM — 6 pieces · 5 articles · 1 post — Newswires 3, Mastodon 2, Google News 1Sep 30, 7 AM — 12 pieces · 8 articles · 4 posts — Newswires 8, Mastodon 3, Bluesky 1Sep 30, 12 PM — 4 pieces · 1 article · 3 posts — Mastodon 2, Bluesky 1, Newswires 1Sep 30, 5 PM — 103 pieces · 3 articles · 1 video · 4 posts · 95 comments — Bluesky 96, Newswires 3, Mastodon 2, +2 moreSep 30, 10 PM — 15 pieces · 15 comments — Bluesky 15Oct 1, 3 AM — 17 pieces · 17 comments — Bluesky 17Oct 1, 8 AM — 11 pieces · 11 comments — Bluesky 11Oct 1, 1 PM — 8 pieces · 8 comments — Bluesky 8Oct 1, 6 PM — quietOct 1, 11 PM — quietOct 2, 4 AM — quietOct 2, 9 AM — quietOct 2, 2 PM — quietOct 2, 7 PM — quietOct 3, 12 AM — quietOct 3, 5 AM — quietOct 3, 10 AM — quietOct 3, 3 PM — quietOct 3, 8 PM — quietOct 4, 1 AM — quietOct 4, 6 AM — quietOct 4, 11 AM — quietOct 4, 4 PM — quietOct 4, 9 PM — quietOct 5, 2 AM — quietOct 5, 7 AM — quietOct 5, 12 PM — quietOct 5, 5 PM — quietOct 5, 10 PM — quietOct 6, 3 AM — quietOct 6, 8 AM — quietOct 6, 1 PM — quietOct 6, 6 PM — quietOct 6, 11 PM — quietOct 7, 4 AM — quietOct 7, 9 AM — quietOct 7, 2 PM — quietOct 7, 7 PM — quietOct 8, 12 AM — quietOct 8, 5 AM — quietOct 8, 10 AM — quietOct 8, 3 PM — quietOct 8, 8 PM — quietOct 9, 1 AM — quietOct 9, 6 AM — quietOct 9, 11 AM — quietOct 9, 4 PM — quietOct 9, 9 PM — quietOct 10, 2 AM — quietOct 10, 7 AM — quietOct 10, 12 PM — quietOct 10, 5 PM — quietOct 10, 10 PM — quietOct 11, 3 AM — quietOct 11, 8 AM — quietOct 11, 1 PM — quietOct 11, 6 PM — quietOct 11, 11 PM — quietOct 12, 4 AM — quietOct 12, 9 AM — quietOct 12, 2 PM — quietOct 12, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 12 AM — quietYesterday, 5 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 3 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietToday, 1 AM — quiet 12345678–9
Sep 25Sep 27Sep 29Oct 1Oct 3Oct 5Oct 7Oct 9Oct 11now · 4:24 AM ET
  1. 9

    Trump breaks silence, defends the ads as non-political

    Responding to reporters for the first time on the controversy, Trump argues the ads aren't campaign material because he isn't on a ballot, and says he would personally pay for them if using taxpayer money is deemed wrong.

    “I'm not running for office first of all ... When I'm talking about making America great, making our country great, that's a countrywide ad. That's an ad for the spirit of our country.”
    — Donald Trump
    1. first by The Hill, 13d ago · also Washington Examiner, Independent UK

      2 more headlines
    2. first by The Hill, 15d ago · also Washington Examiner, Awful Announcing

      2 more headlines
    4 more claims →
    • meidastouch.com

      Trump is now running pro-Iran War propaganda commercials on Fox News paid by for taxpayer dollars

      meidastouch.comBluesky13d ago1.8k▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 148 posts in this stretch
    • 🚨 UNDEREXAMINED STORY “PAID FOR BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.” That disclaimer is appearing on Trump-focused TV ads airing weeks before the midterms. And now we know more about the money. AdImpact estimates at least: $2.5 MILLION in airtime for three ads. 2,766 AIRINGS in one

      @SkylineReportX13d ago8▲view on X ↗
    • All federal taxes should be frozen as our tax money is being stolen and used illegally.

      stopdropendfascism.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago105▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  2. 8

    FCC Chairman Carr dismisses the ads as a normal PSA

    FCC Chairman Brendan Carr pushes back on criticism of the taxpayer-funded ads, describing them as something government routinely does.

    “A Normal PSA…”
    — Brendan Carr
    1. first by The Washington Sun, 13d ago · also MS NOW, The Wrap

      2 more headlines
    • christianthiels.eurosky.social

      "Broadcast stations cannot reject ads from legally qualified political candidates – but Trump is not technically a candidate, although he has urged voters to imagine that he is, on the November ballot." @theguardian.com

      christianthiels.eurosky.socialBluesky13d ago12▲view on Bluesky ↗
    1 more of the top 2 · 2 posts in this stretch
    • https://www. europesays.com/unitedstates/40 89/ First Draft: 📺 Trump’s White House Agrees His ‘Midterm Ads’ Are Illegal. They’re Doing It Anyway # ExecutiveBranch # POTUS # PresidentOfTheUnitedStates # WhiteHouse # WhiteHouse &ExecutiveBranch

      UnitedStates@pubeurope.comMastodon13d agoview on Mastodon ↗
    all of them →
  3. 7

    Ad-tracking firm estimates millions already spent, $20M allocated

    CNN reports that a political ad-tracking firm estimates millions of taxpayer dollars have already gone to the hagiographic ads, with a total of $20 million allocated, an effort watchdog groups call illegal.

    • Millions of taxpayer dollars have already been spent on President Donald Trump’s hagiographic ads, according to estimates by a leading political ad-tracking firm. And a total of $20 million has been allocated for the effort, which watchdog groups have deemed illegal.

      @CNNX14d ago306▲view on X ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 19 posts in this stretch
    • maddie-says.bsky.social

      DHS is paying for Trump’s fluffier ads. MAGA, are you okay with this? Never mind, of course you are. 🙄 #DemVoice1 #ProudBlue #Pinks

      maddie-says.bsky.socialBluesky14d ago198▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • Keep in mind the Left is nothing close to blameless, either. They *know* their ideals are controversial, many of them reducing America's influence on the world to little-to-nothing opening the space for the growth of Hamas-like, Iranian-like, Russia/China-like influences to grow and become the world's cultural hegemony instead. For better or…

      cloverpopperr/news14d agoview on r/news ↗
    all of them →
  4. 6

    DHS confirmed to have funneled $1.5M–$20M into the ads

    Reporting reveals the Department of Homeland Security tapped millions of dollars, out of a $20 million allocation, to pay for campaign-style ads glorifying Trump; a former Bush ethics lawyer condemns the practice.

    “sheer propaganda ... what authoritarian governments do to promote their leaders…”
    — Richard Painter
    1. first by Newser, 14d ago · also HuffPost, Yahoo, Orlando Sentinel, Mercury News, Baltimore Sun, Philadelphia Inquirer +2

      1 more headline
    2. first by Wall Street Journal, 14d ago · also CBC, Independent UK, Japan Today

      3 more headlines
    2 more claims →
    • motherjones.com

      Well at least everyone agrees about one thing. "Using taxpayer dollars to run ominous campaign ads of the President has been done before and is completely legal…in banana republics."

      motherjones.comBluesky15d ago201▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 24 posts in this stretch
    • The federal government has spent at least $1.7 million to air three different TV ads featuring President Trump in recent days, per ABC

      @unusual_whalesX14d ago35▲view on X ↗
    • georgetakei

      Why are we paying for this?? https://www. comicsands.com/trump-governmen t-funded-campaign-ad?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=infeed&utm_campaign=linkprogram

      georgetakeiMastodon14d ago31▲view on Mastodon ↗
    all of them →
  5. 5

    Legal advocates say ads cross line Congress drew

    Democracy Defenders Action and allied legal figures argue the ads blow past congressional restrictions on taxpayer-funded self-promotion and signal that litigation options are being considered.

    “Can a president run his own political ads on your tax dollars? Congress said NO, & these ads blow right past it!”
    — normeisen.bsky.social
    1. first by NPR Politics, 15d ago · also Independent UK, Mediaite, Mother Jones, Yahoo, Reason, The Atlantic +2

      6 more headlines
    • normeisen.bsky.social

      Can a president run his own political ads on your tax dollars? Congress said NO, & these ads blow right past it! All options are on the table for @democracydefendersaction.org , so stay tuned Here's the legal case against these ads, w/ @MorningEdition on @npr.org 👇 -TN

      normeisen.bsky.socialBluesky15d ago699▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 19 posts in this stretch
    • Nonilex@masto.ai

      # Trump admin airs 2024 Trump campaign ad in latest # taxpayer funded messaging The 30-second video, which is virtually identical to one that aired in 2024, shows Trump walking down a hallway as his voice can be heard warning of a “final battle” against “globalists” & “warmongers.” It ends with a message that says: “Paid for by the U.S…

      Nonilex@masto.aiMastodon15d ago22▲view on Mastodon ↗
    • forbes.com

      The White House has insisted such ads are “public service announcements,” but the use of taxpayer funds has drawn criticism from both Democrats and Republicans.

      forbes.comBluesky16d ago511▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  6. 4

    New taxpayer-funded ad reuses 2024 campaign footage

    A further White House ad, reportedly recycling material from Trump's 2024 campaign and warning of a "final battle" ahead of the midterms, begins airing, intensifying bipartisan complaints.

    1. 13 outlets first by NBC News, 16d ago · also PBS NewsHour, Boston Globe, Denver Post, Orlando Sentinel, Baltimore Sun, Mercury News +6 · read ↗

    2. first by Washington Times, 15d ago · also ABC News, Yahoo News Singapore, CNN

      2 more headlines
    9 more claims →
    • White House airs new taxpayer-funded TV ad featuring Trump “final battle” warning ahead of midterms.

      @NewsWire_USX16d ago280▲view on X ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 16 posts in this stretch
    • cdarwin@c.im

      Television advertisements with a pro-Trump message — and paid for by the U.S. government — are expanding their reach ahead of November’s midterm elections, prompting bipartisan scrutiny over whether the campaign complies with federal restrictions on taxpayer-funded publicity and propaganda. One of the ads — backed by music that repeats the words…

      cdarwin@c.imMastodon16d ago1▲view on Mastodon ↗
    • Think of the only two skills he has and how it got him to where he is and how it is shaping things His first skill is being a con artist, he had the starting money from his parents to be able to constantly trick people into deals that ended up being bad for them, he refined the skill over years They would then sue him and that's where he learned…

      Status-Secret-4292r/politics16d agoview on r/politics ↗
    all of them →
  7. 1 day quiet
  8. 3

    White House calls the Fox ad a public service announcement

    Facing mounting criticism, the White House characterizes the pro-Trump spot it paid Fox to air as a PSA rather than political advertising, a defense repeated as additional ads surface.

    1. 5 outlets first by NBC News, 19d ago · also CNN, KEYT-TV, HuffPost, The Atlantic · read ↗

    2. first by Los Angeles Times, 18d ago · also New Republic, LA Times, Yahoo

      2 more headlines
    1 more claim →
    • Trump is using TAXPAYER DOLLARS to run ads on TV promoting himself. 🤬

      @AnnieForTruthX17d ago4.2k▲view on X ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 21 posts in this stretch
    • motherjones.com

      The White House is burning public funds on political advertising—which even Republicans are condemning.

      motherjones.comBluesky18d ago397▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • dangillmor@mastodon.social

      All corruption, all the time in Trump world: U.S. taxpayers are footing the bill for Trump-praising advertisements running on right-wing media. It's a transfer of our money to media scumbags that are effectively part of the regime. https:// abcnews.com/Politics/trump-adm…

      dangillmor@mastodon.socialMastodon18d ago11▲view on Mastodon ↗
    all of them →
  9. 2

    WSJ and Washington Post report ads may violate federal law

    Reporting notes the ad campaign appears to conflict with a federal prohibition on using taxpayer dollars for "publicity or propaganda," with ethics experts quoted warning of possible legal violations.

    “A television ad promoting President Trump began airing on cable Wednesday saying it was paid for by the U.S. government, despite a federal prohibition on using taxpayer dollars for "publicity or propaganda."”
    — Washington Post
    1. first by UPI, 15d ago · also Deadline, Sydney Morning Herald

      3 more headlines
    2. first by Guardian Media, 13d ago · also Guardian

    • This is illegal Notice the text at the bottom, “paid for by the US government”. Why the hell is the US government and our taxpayers paying for Trump political ad on Fox News?

      @krassensteinX19d ago19k▲view on X ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 121 posts in this stretch
    • wsj.com

      A pro-Trump ad that said it was paid for by the U.S. government aired on Fox News in major TV markets. Ethics experts said it could violate federal law. on.

      wsj.comBluesky19d ago879▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • AltAltNPS@noc.social

      Can’t believe our tax dollars are being used for political ads. The White House is now airing a taxpayer-funded ad during commercial breaks on Fox News. The 30-second spot has all the markings of a campaign ad, except the disclaimer at the bottom says: “Paid for by the U.S. Government.” https:// bsky.app/profile/altnps.bsky.s…

      AltAltNPS@noc.socialMastodon19d ago8▲view on Mastodon ↗
    all of them →
  10. 1

    Pro-Trump ad airs on Fox News with government disclaimer

    A taxpayer-funded ad featuring Trump imagery and the disclaimer "Paid for by the U.S. Government" begins airing during Fox News programs including Jesse Watters' show, quickly going viral.

    “So I was just watching Fox News and this commercial played during Jesse Watters show. It says "Paid for by the US Government." This is clearly a campaign ad.”
    — @DeFede
    1. first by Scripps News, 14d ago · also Time, Yahoo News Canada, Time Magazine, Associated Press, Boston Globe, AP News +8

      1 more headline
    2. first by The Washington Sun, 19d ago · also Independent UK, Associated Press, Denver Post, Orlando Sentinel, Mercury News, Baltimore Sun +2

      3 more headlines
    5 more claims →
    • The White House is currently airing this video as an ad during commercial breaks on Fox News. It looks and sounds like a political spot and includes a disclaimer stating that it is paid for by the U.S. government. The soundtrack: as images of Trump flash across the screen,

      @yasharX20d ago1.6k▲view on X ↗
    1 more of the top 2 · 2 posts in this stretch
    • So I was just watching Fox News and this commercial played during Jesse Watters show. It says “Paid for by the US Government.” This is clearly a campaign ad. And the singers are just singing over and over again, “Love me” - over images of Trump. @CBSMiami @CBSNews

      @DeFedeX20d ago1.2k▲view on X ↗
    all of them →

Also covered reported alongside — the timeline has no entry for these yet

  1. first by Poynter, 14d ago · also Robert Reich, Vox, MS NOW

    3 more headlines
  2. first by yahoo.com, 14d ago · also The Hill, Yahoo News UK

  3. first by Mastodon, 19d ago · also Common Dreams, Axios

    2 more headlines
  4. first by Mastodon, 16d ago · also Mother Jones

  5. first by Zeteo | Substack, 17d ago · also Zeteo

  6. first by Election Law Blog, 18d ago · also NYT

  7. first by Washington Post, 19d ago · also The Washington Post

and 13 smaller pieces

What people are saying 8 voices from 4 sites · best of 372 · verbatim

Still unanswered
  • Is there really no way to stop this illegal behavior, or any legal mechanism like an "equal time" clause to counter it?
  • Will Congress, which controls federal appropriations, actually impose spending restrictions on this ad campaign?