Fired OpenAI safety researchers publish letter rebutting misconduct claims
Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni say OpenAI's firing story doesn't add up and warn the dismissals are chilling internal safety work.
Part of a larger narrative
The Rogue AI Crisis
- Axios: OpenAI, Anthropic privately war-game public revolt after a catastrophic AI event
- OpenAI's revenue signal turns murky, rattling AI stocks
- UK minister to call for AI safety standards as Geoffrey Irving warns of model theft risks
- OpenAI's 722-paper math dump splits mathematicians, forces retractions
- OpenAI apologizes to Australia over rogue-agent hacks, vows fixes
What to know
- OpenAI fired three safety researchers on Oct. 1, alleging they mishandled confidential information outside company procedures.
- On Oct. 8 the researchers — Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni — went public, denying the specific allegations and warning the firings are chilling safety-related speech at OpenAI.
- OpenAI has not formally answered the open letter but circulated an internal memo denying retaliation, while separately telling TechCrunch an investigation found a broader 'pattern of misconduct.'
- The dispute raises a broader question, flagged by outside analysis, about whether AI labs can be trusted to self-police disclosure of their own safety incidents.
Jasmine Wang Fired OpenAI safety researcherTomek Korbak Fired OpenAI safety researcherMikita Balesni Fired OpenAI safety researcherOpenAI AI developer, employer of the fired researchers
How it unfolded 4 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlespostscomments
-
3
OpenAI denies retaliation in internal memo
OpenAI shared with TechCrunch an internal memo from a research leader praising the three researchers' safety contributions while insisting the firings were not retaliatory; separately a spokesperson said an investigation found a broader 'pattern of misconduct.'
“I want to be very clear that these decisions were not about raising safety concerns or speaking out.”
— OpenAI research leader (internal memo) -
first by CBS News, 5d ago · also CNBC, Advertising, Marketing …, Business Standard, Financial Express, RTÉ, The Verge +14
15 more headlines
- OpenAI defends decision to fire researchers: 'These decisions were not about raising safety concerns or speaking out' CNBC · 4d ago
- OpenAI safety researchers challenge firing, raise concerns over company culture Advertising, Marketing … · 4d ago
- OpenAI fires three safety researchers over alleged breach of trust Business Standard · 4d ago
- OpenAI defends firing three safety researchers after ‘significant breach of trust’ Financial Express · 4d ago
- OpenAI sacks three safety researchers for breach of trust RTÉ · 4d ago
- OpenAI doubles down on decision to fire three AI safety researchers Mastodon · 4d ago
- OpenAI fires three safety researchers for "mishandling research information" HN Best · 4d ago
- OpenAI defends firing of 3 AI safety researchers, cites ‘significant breach of trust’ Indian Express · 4d ago
- OpenAI defended firing three safety researchers, calling it a 'breach of trust' Quartz · 4d ago
- OpenAI fires three safety researchers in dispute over AI risks Globe and Mail · 4d ago
- OpenAI fires 3 safety researchers in dispute over AI risks Orlando Sentinel · 4d ago
- OpenAI says it didn’t fire 3 safety researchers for 'speaking out' on AI risks Business Insider · 4d ago
- OpenAI denies firing researchers for raising safety concerns UPI · 4d ago
- OpenAI denies firing researchers over AI safety warnings Channel News Asia · 4d ago
- OpenAI defends firing AI safety researchers over "breach of trust" CBS News · 4d ago
-
3 outlets Fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute misconduct claims, warn of chilling effect | TechCrunch
first by Mastodon, 5d ago · also TechCrunch, The Rundown AI
2 more headlines
- Fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute misconduct claims, warn of chilling effect TechCrunch · 5d ago
- Fired OpenAI researchers dispute misconduct claims and seek clearer rules The Rundown AI · 4d ago
-
O
Three fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute allegations of mishandling sensitive information, warning in an open lett... #Techcrunch #breakingnews #news #othur
2 more of the top 3 · 38 posts in this stretch
-
OpenAI responded on twitter earlier:"A note from our research leaders:Last week we parted ways with Jasmine, Mikita, and Tomek after a thorough investigation found they violated clear policies on handling sensitive information. Our internal investigation uncovered a significant breach of trust beyond what’s outlined in the letter they published…
-
W
3 # AI safety researchers have been fired by # OpenAI . In an open letter, they warn that AI safety cannot be guaranteed by companies alone. They call for independent audits, greater transparency, AI systems that remain understandable and monitorable, and a culture where researchers can raise concerns without fear. Their message: 👉 AI safety…
-
-
background
Researchers ask OpenAI to preserve AI-reasoning visibility — The Wall Street Journal and The Information reported the fired researchers are pressing OpenAI to maintain monitorable chain-of-thought reasoning in its models and say they were effectively let go for prioritizing safety work.
-
4
Letter warns dismissals chill internal safety culture
The researchers said abrupt, unclear terminations are making colleagues afraid to speak up and collaborate with outside experts, calling that freedom an essential safety mechanism.
“Terminations such as ours, executed and communicated so abruptly, are chilling the open culture OpenAI has prized in the past.”
— Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni -
2
Fired researchers name themselves, publish open letter
Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni identified themselves as the three fired researchers and published an open letter to OpenAI's Safety and Security Committee, Safety Advisory Group and Mission Advisory Council denying the misconduct allegations and the leak to The Information about less-monitorable model architectures.
“AI is not a normal technology, and OpenAI is not a normal company.”
— Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni -
first by OECD AI Policy Observatory, 5d ago · also The Rundown AI, Digit, The Economic Times, @balesni, CNN, The Hindu +5
10 more headlines
- Fired OpenAI safety researchers hit back The Rundown AI · 5d ago
- Fired OpenAI researchers deny misconduct allegations, warn of impact on AI safety Digit · 5d ago
- Fired security researchers accuse OpenAI of ‘chilling’ safety efforts The Economic Times · 5d ago
- AI researcher Mikita Balesni says he believes OpenAI fired him, Tomek Korbak, and Jasmine Wang for “prioritizing safety over the near-term interests of OpenAI” @balesni · 5d ago
- Fired OpenAI safety researchers say they were pushed out over ‘suspicious’ circumstances CNN · 5d ago
- Fired researchers accuse OpenAI of 'chilling' safety efforts The Hindu · 5d ago
- OpenAI gets in public fight with three safety researchers it fired The Independent · 4d ago
- OpenAI says fired safety researchers broke trust, denies retaliation RuntimeWire · 4d ago
- Fired OpenAI researchers say they were let go for 'prioritising safety' BBC Business · 4d ago
- Ex-OpenAI staff say they were fired for raising safety concerns Al Jazeera · 4d ago
-
first by Reuters, 4d ago · also CNBC, Investing.com News, Channel News Asia
-
Great scoop from Max: after OpenAI fired them, the 3 safety researchers wrote a letter to leadership. One of the company's safety leaders “strongly agreed” with the letter's recommendations, but maintained the firings “were not about raising safety concerns or speaking out.” I still haven't heard a good explanation about why these researchers were…
-
- 3 days quiet
-
1
FortuneFirings show labs self-police safety disclosures
Fortune's analysis argued the episode demonstrates that AI labs alone currently control what the public learns about internal safety incidents.
“The firings show that, for now, AI labs alone decide what the public learns about their safety incidents.”
— Fortune -
first by Fortune, 8d ago
-
C
# OpenAI # ai https:// techcrunch.com/2026/10/01/open ai-cuts-ties-with-three-safety-researchers-wsj-reports/
-
-
background
OpenAI fires three safety-team researchers — OpenAI dismissed three safety researchers it said had shared confidential company information with a third-party AI safety organization, outside established procedures, per a Wall Street Journal report.
Also covered reported alongside — the timeline has no entry for these yet
-
first by Business Insider, 5d ago · also Engadget, Forbes Europe, Newsweek
3 more headlines
- Fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute their dismissals in open letter Engadget · 4d ago
- Read the letter fired OpenAI researchers wrote after their dismissals Forbes Europe · 4d ago
- Trio of Workers Fired by OpenAI: Read Their Warning Letter in Full Newsweek · 4d ago
-
first by The Times of India, 10d ago
1 more headline
- OpenAI fires three researchers, company confirms sacking; shares what investigations that led to terminat The Times of India · 10d ago
and 6 smaller pieces
What people are saying 19 voices from 3 sites · best of 41 · verbatim
- Oct 9
-
agents seem to understand "termination" in that they will no longer be able to function so seems plausible they might try to cause that onto others as a functionwas thinking at some generational point that vending machine competition test, the "AI" is going to hire hitmen to take out vendors lolonce they grasp blackmail though, oooh things are…
-
The AI "safety" scene is so so deeply weird. This radio piece capture some interesting quotes:
-
Multiple things can be correct at the same time.OpenAI needs to improve AI Safety --- OpenAI Employees have a responsibility to retain corporate secrets and do not have blanket freedom to share with 3rd parties.Their job is twofold, they have to balance being an agent of the company they work for, with their role and responsibility for safety…
-
I agree that "AI safety" these days should be viewed more like corporate negligence leading to industrial accidents, and less like applied theology.Kind of like the difference between:1. "Don't put your Radioactive Asbestos Rocket facility in the middle of downtown."2. "Don't create a vengeful god."
-
I can see parallels between this race to push AI everywhere and nuclear energy. Parallels in the regret humanity will experience. It's all well and good until things go wrong, and then they go spectacularly wrong - such as in Fukushima.With hindsight we can all see what should have been done better. At least with nuclear power plants, there was a…
-
People leave and get fired from OpenAI all the time. Whenever someone leaves Anthropic it's a much bigger deal.I wonder which is overall a better arrangement. From the outside Anthropic seems much more stable, tranquil, able to deal with problems. However OpenAI seems like how we imagine the calamities of democracy, a constant battle, people vying…
-
This was the plot of Isaac Asimov's short story, The Evitable Conflict[0], published in 1950.In it, super-powerful computers manage our economy. These computers begin making some mistakes, leading to economic inefficiencies. In one instance, a highly competent engineer was mistakenly fired. These mistakes caused various projects to fall behind…
-
With the way the HuggingFace incident was mishandled, both before and after it happened, I'm not surprised they'd want to clean house at least a little bit.You guys were asleep at the wheel and are now blaming "the company"? You literally were the company.
-
> continue to support an open and transparent culture of dialogue between safety researchers and the rest of the safety ecosystem.How is this possible when the company's long term prospects rely on on the hope that competitors don't know how the models are made and, therefore, won't be able to create competing versions?
-
Good to see OpenAI standing firm here. They say the researchers were fired for serious breaches of trust, not for raising safety concerns. They're also expanding independent safety assessments. Effective altruism taken to extremes could genuinely endanger humanity. Just look at Sam Bankman-Fried,...
-
OpenAI just responded to the open letter from the three safety researchers it fired last week. > Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni were let go after an internal investigation OpenAI says found “a significant breach of trust
- Oct 8
-
OpenAI has fired three safety researchers, alleging they mishandled confidential information. After the recent multi-agent security incidents, will the technical leadership overseeing these systems face the same accountability? I was pushed out of OpenAI in August after ~5 years as a researcher. ...
-
The three Ex-OpenAI researchers say they believe they were fired for prioritizing safety over OpenAI's near-term corporate interests. They also deny being the source of the leak behind The Information's recent report on allegedly less monitorable AI architectures. On the one hand, there seems to...
-
This seems extremely sketchy behavior from OpenAI I don't want to pass judgement before hearing OpenAI's side, but I doubt these three are lying about not hearing good reasons And why would 3 associated safety researchers be fired *simultaneously* for 2-3 unrelated events?
-
I worry that OpenAI is going to use our firing as an excuse to cut off the relationship with @METR_evals, or otherwise not give the most competent safety auditors continuous employee-level access that @sama promised.
-
I think highly of Tomek, Mikita and Jasmine. OpenAI firing them has made me more skeptical of OpenAI as an organization and OpenAI's ability to ensure that their models are safe [embedded post]
-
OK so, OpenAI fired 3 safety researchers last week, allegedly for leaking information to a 3rd party safety organization. …
-
The three OpenAI employees who were fired last week have posted an open letter to OpenAI.
-
C
Three fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute misconduct allegations and warn their dismissals are creating a chilling effect on the company's AI safety… #AI #OpenAI #AIsafety