conv.

All stories
AIFading · day 3

Microsoft president calls for global AI regulation, defying Trump

Brad Smith argues AI needs binding safety rules, contradicting the president's push for industry self-regulation.

Part of a larger narrative

The AI Regulation Debate

5 stories · since Sep 24 · newest 6h ago — Tech leaders and critics clash over whether artificial intelligence poses existential risks warranting emergency regulation, or whether such warnings are…

  1. Microsoft president calls for global AI regulation, defying Trumpyou are here
  2. Nadella Calls for an AI ‘Emergency Brake’ Humans Can Always Pull
  3. UK minister to call for AI safety standards as Geoffrey Irving warns of model theft risks
  4. Gebru: AI 'existential risk' narrative is harmful marketing, not science
  5. Bill Gates escalates AI warnings, says unregulated systems could cause 'a billion deaths'

What to know

  • Microsoft president Brad Smith publicly contradicts Trump by calling for binding global AI safety rules—incident reporting, kill switches, and independent government vetting—contrasting with Trump's push for industry self-regulation.
  • Smith argues AI is undertested compared to consumer products like milk and washing machines, which face mandatory safety inspections.
  • Smith proposes the UK as the best positioned nation to lead global AI regulation, suggesting the US would be more receptive to UK standards than EU rules.

Brad Smith Microsoft presidentDonald TrumpDonald Trump US PresidentAnthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind AI company leaders

Microsoft president calls for global AI regulation, defying Trump
bbc.co.uk

How it unfolded 2 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlesvideospostscomments

Peak 29 pieces in one hour at Oct 12, 6 AM; 102 pieces over 3 days (52 articles · 1 video · 37 posts · 12 comments) Oct 11, 6 PM — 7 pieces · 3 articles · 4 posts — Mastodon 3, Newswires 3, Hacker News 1Oct 11, 7 PM — quietOct 11, 8 PM — quietOct 11, 9 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Bluesky 1Oct 11, 10 PM — quietOct 11, 11 PM — quietOct 12, 12 AM — quietOct 12, 1 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — X 1Oct 12, 2 AM — 3 pieces · 2 articles · 1 post — Newswires 2, Mastodon 1Oct 12, 3 AM — 9 pieces · 8 articles · 1 post — Google News 5, Newswires 2, Bluesky 1, +1 moreOct 12, 4 AM — 4 pieces · 2 articles · 2 posts — Mastodon 2, Newswires 2Oct 12, 5 AM — 5 pieces · 3 articles · 2 posts — Google News 2, Mastodon 1, Newswires 1, +1 moreOct 12, 6 AM — 29 pieces · 23 articles · 6 posts — Newswires 23, Mastodon 3, X 3Oct 12, 7 AM — 5 pieces · 3 articles · 2 posts — Newswires 3, Hacker News 2Oct 12, 8 AM — 5 pieces · 4 posts · 1 comment — Mastodon 2, Reddit 2, Hacker News 1Oct 12, 9 AM — quietOct 12, 10 AM — 11 pieces · 4 articles · 5 posts · 2 comments — Mastodon 5, Google News 2, Newswires 2, +2 moreOct 12, 11 AM — 6 pieces · 1 post · 5 comments — Hacker News 5, Bluesky 1Oct 12, 12 PM — 4 pieces · 1 article · 3 comments — Hacker News 3, Newswires 1Oct 12, 1 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1Oct 12, 2 PM — quietOct 12, 3 PM — 1 piece · 1 article — Newswires 1Oct 12, 4 PM — quietOct 12, 5 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Oct 12, 6 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Oct 12, 7 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Oct 12, 8 PM — quietOct 12, 9 PM — quietOct 12, 10 PM — quietOct 12, 11 PM — 2 pieces · 2 posts — Bluesky 1, Mastodon 1Oct 13, 12 AM — quietOct 13, 1 AM — quietOct 13, 2 AM — 1 piece · 1 article — Newswires 1Oct 13, 3 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Oct 13, 4 AM — quietOct 13, 5 AM — quietOct 13, 6 AM — quietOct 13, 7 AM — quietOct 13, 8 AM — 1 piece · 1 article — Mastodon 1Oct 13, 9 AM — quietOct 13, 10 AM — quietOct 13, 11 AM — quietOct 13, 12 PM — quietOct 13, 1 PM — quietOct 13, 2 PM — quietOct 13, 3 PM — quietOct 13, 4 PM — quietOct 13, 5 PM — quietOct 13, 6 PM — quietOct 13, 7 PM — quietOct 13, 8 PM — quietOct 13, 9 PM — quietOct 13, 10 PM — quietOct 13, 11 PM — quietYesterday, 12 AM — quietYesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 3 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 5 AM — quietYesterday, 6 AM — quietYesterday, 7 AM — quietYesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 9 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — 1 piece · 1 video — YouTube 1Yesterday, 11 AM — quietYesterday, 12 PM — quietYesterday, 1 PM — quietYesterday, 2 PM — quietYesterday, 3 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 6 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Yesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 9 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 11 PM — quietToday, 12 AM — quietToday, 1 AM — quiet 1–2
Oct 12Oct 13yesterdaynow · 2:49 AM ET
  1. 1

    Smith positions UK as ideal leader for AI regulation; suggests US openness to UK standards over EU rules

    Smith praised the UK's AI Security Institute as the best-positioned body to drive global AI rules, noting the UK has superior technical capability in AI safety. He suggested the US would be more accepting of UK-led standards than EU regulation, given different political relationships in Washington.

    “In the world of technology, in the tech sector, most people that I know would say, if you ask them, name the country that is the leader in having this technical capability, they would say, it's very simple. It's the United Kingdom. They are the best.”
    — Brad Smith
    • 🇺🇸 Microsoft President Brad Smith says AI faces fewer safety regulations than milk and washing machines. Smith described AI as both a "tool and a weapon," calling for global safety standards and independent testing of AI systems before their release. He also urged companies to

      @MarioNawfalX2d ago13▲view on X ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 23 posts in this stretch
    • SuffolkLITLab@esq.social

      TL;DR: Microsoft president Brad Smith warns that AI regulations are currently weaker than those for milk, advocating for enhanced safety measures including legal responsibilities for victims of AI breaches. https://www. theguardian.com/technology/202 6/oct/12/ai-less-regulated-than-milk-microsoft-president-calls-for-tougher-rules # law # tech #…

      SuffolkLITLab@esq.socialMastodon2d ago1▲view on Mastodon ↗
    • Part of the problem is surely that we know how milk should be produced and consumed safely, but we don't know how AI should be produced and made accessible safely.Should we be more concerned about malevolent humans using AI to cause harm? Or should we be more worried about misaligned AI agents escaping their sandbox to cause harm? Or should we be…

      loudmaxHacker News2d agoview on Hacker News ↗
    all of them →
  2. 2

    Brad Smith calls for mandatory global AI safety rules, challenging Trump's deregulation stance

    In a BBC Big Boss Interview, Microsoft president Brad Smith argued that AI is less regulated than consumer products like milk and washing machines. He called for binding global safety rules including legal requirements for incident reporting when AI systems malfunction, kill switches to pause runaway systems, and independent government evaluators to vet new AI products before release.

    “Right now, your washing machine is subject to more safety rules than AI. Every carton of milk that you see in the grocery store is subject to safety rules and inspection.”
    — Brad Smith
    1. first by BBC, 2d ago · also Engadget, Quartz, HN Frontpage, The Guardian, CNET, Fox Business +7

      10 more headlines
    2. first by Telegraph India, 2d ago · also Gadget Review, Gizmodo, The American Bazaar, PC Gamer, Advertising, Marketing, Media & Digital News, Seeking Alpha +5

      13 more headlines
    1 more claim →
  3. background

    Trump hosts tech leaders at White House; companies sign self-regulation pledge — President Trump convened leaders from OpenAI, Anthropic, Nvidia, SpaceX, Meta, and Google at the White House. The executives signed a "morally binding" document committing to work with independent auditors to assess AI systems and prevent unintended hacking or access.

What people are saying 19 voices from 5 sites · best of 23 · verbatim